Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of CityRP.

SignUp Now!

Case: Pending Anthony Org v. Ministry of Justice

Anthony_org

Member
Anthony_org
Anthony_org
Citizen
Joined
Nov 11, 2025
Messages
30

Anthony_org

v.

Ministry of Justice

This civil action arises from the unlawful arrest, detention, and incarceration of Plaintiff Anthony_org by employees of the Ministry of Justice (“MoJ”) without due process of law. Plaintiff was jailed without a hearing, without an opportunity to defend themselves, and under a presumption of guilt rather than innocence.

These actions violated the Constitution of Azalea Isles, specifically:
  • Article 1, Section 9 – Right to self-representation or counsel in a court of law
Plaintiff brings this action to protect constitutional rights and to prevent continued abuse of executive authority by the Ministry of Justice.


PARTIES
  1. Plaintiff:
    Anthony_org
  2. Defendant:
    The Ministry of Justice

STATEMENT OF FACTS
  1. On 1/12/2026, Plaintiff was arrested by employees of the Ministry of Justice.
  2. Plaintiff was immediately jailed without:
    • a judicial hearing,
    • a formal charge being adjudicated by a court,
    • or an opportunity to defend themselves.
  3. No court order authorizing incarceration was issued prior to Plaintiff being jailed.
  1. Plaintiff was treated as guilty upon arrest.
  2. Plaintiff was not afforded the presumption of innocence.
  3. No opportunity was provided to present evidence or challenge the allegations prior to punishment.
  4. After Plaintiff contested the charges the arresting officer responded "I don't give a singular fuck"

LEGAL CLAIMS
  1. Plaintiff was denied the opportunity to represent themselves or obtain counsel before incarceration.
  2. Punishment was imposed prior to any judicial process.
  3. This conduct violates Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution of Azalea Isles.

DAMAGES
  1. As a direct result of Defendant’s actions, Plaintiff suffered:
    • unlawful loss of liberty,
    • emotional distress,
    • reputational harm,
    • deprivation of constitutional rights.
    • $350 azalean dollars

Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court:
  1. Issue a judicial finding that the Ministry of Justice violated:
    • Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution of Azalea Isles;
  2. Declare Plaintiff’s arrest and incarceration unconstitutional;
  3. Award compensatory damages in an amount determined by the Court;
  4. Award punitive damages in the amount of $10,000;
  5. Award compensatory damages in the amount of $350;
  6. Award legal damages equal to 20% of damages awarded;
  7. Grant injunctive relief preventing MoJ personnel from:
    • incarcerating citizens without judicial adjudication,
    • presuming guilt prior to trial;
  8. Grant any further relief the Court deems just and proper.

I, Anthony_org, hereby affirm that the allegations in this complaint AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.
1768236376838.png1768236403236.png
 

Motion for Emergency Injunction​

Plaintiff respectfully requests that this court immediately put the arresting officer, Snow_crp on administrative leave during the duration of this case due to their unprofessional handling of the arrest of the plaintiff. Plaintiff moves that all officers of the law shall remain professional and avoid insulting or dismissing alleged criminals during arrests.
 
MOTION TO AMEND
Your honor, after being informed how to pull up chat logs I would like to amend my case filing as follows
STATEMENT OF FACTS
5. Arresting officer added escape and assault charges to plaintiff
6. Arresting officer has not updated plaintiffs criminal record with the charges and proof of plaintiff committing these acts.
7. Plaintiff was not given the chance to contest these additional charges

1768238276422.png 1768238389116.png
 
MOTION TO DROP CASE
Your honor, I move to drop this case after I was informed that the offending officer was removed from their post. Seeing as the Ministry has tried their best to stop continuous violations of Article 1 Section 9 of the constitution with internal announcements I see no need to continue this specific case.
 
Back
Top