Appeal on the Matter of Robi Hawes v. Ministry of Justice (2025) CV 14

[Courts of Azalea Isles]

Supreme Court of Azalea Isles - Case Appeal
District Court Link: https://www.cityrp.org/threads/robi-hawes-v-ministry-of-justice-2025-cv-14.2980/
District Court Judge: Honourable Fauz Wolfe (fauzfauzfauz)
Decision Date: December 22, 2025

On the matter of Robi Hawes v. Ministry of Justice (2025) CV 14, appellant Robi Hawes (Robidemon2) has filed an appeal based on the: Case Verdict.

“I, Robi Hawes, am requesting review of the ruling made by the District Court of Azalea on the Verdict.”

Appeals are heard by the Supreme Court of Azalea Isles based on the procedures outlined in Appealing a Case thread. Accordingly, after a party to the case has requested an appeal in its original thread, the Supreme Court will:

1. Open a new thread with the appeal (this thread). Then ask the appellant to provide justification for such appeal.
2. Decide whether to hear the appeal. If the Supreme Court, by majority, agrees to hear the appeal, it shall proceed to the next step. If they decide not to hear the appeal, the process will stop there.
3. Request written arguments from both sides (with a standard 48 hour deadline)
4. Issue a ruling that either affirms or reverses the ruling made by the District Court

 

[Westray]

@Robidemon2 is hereby called to the Supreme Court to provide justification for requesting the appeal on Robi Hawes v. Ministry of Justice (2025) CV 14/

Please provide a response within 48 hours.

 

[Robidemon2]

Your Honor,
The verdict in CV14 fails to take into consideration many of the different arguments brought before it, and additionally we believe that it is based on a flawed interpretation of unreasonable search and seizure.

Firstly, the verdict in our opinion fails to take into account the legislative intent behind the existence of 2 warrant classes. It is our belief that the wording of the legislation quite clearly supports our interpretation of the difference between a search warrant and an arrest warrant. Searching a property for an individual is considered to be a "search", the distinction created by Honourable Fauz is one not based in our constitution or the intent of its writters.

The verdict by Honourable Fauz allows police officers in the Azalea aisles to circumvent the constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure. Mr Bezzer's property was searched without a search warrant in an attempt to arrest me, thus constituting an unreasonable search and seizure. Furthermore Honourable Fauz sets a dangerous precedent were for unreasonable search and seizure to apply, one must have their objects searched throught.

We really stress that this verdict must be overturned atleast in part to avoid this becoming case precedent thus having the potential to affect countless more individuals.

 

[Westray]

Thank you for your response.

Given the large volume of cases, please allow the Court a period of one week to review the District Court case and make a decision as to whether an appeal should be considered at this time.