- Joined
- Nov 13, 2025
- Messages
- 162
- Thread Author
- #1
Aero Nox
v.
Ministry of State
Introduction
This is a civil action brought by the Plaintiff, Aero Nox, against the Ministry of State (MoS) for their execution of unconstitutional Parliamentary audits. Nowhere in our body of law is this responsibility defined as a mandate for the the Ministry of State. As such, their execution of these audits is unconstitutional and a waste of public funds.
Parties
Factual Allegations
As a direct result of the Ministry of Justice’s actions, the Plaintiff suffered:
The Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court grant the following relief:
v.
Ministry of State
Introduction
This is a civil action brought by the Plaintiff, Aero Nox, against the Ministry of State (MoS) for their execution of unconstitutional Parliamentary audits. Nowhere in our body of law is this responsibility defined as a mandate for the the Ministry of State. As such, their execution of these audits is unconstitutional and a waste of public funds.
Parties
- Plaintiff Aero Nox - A Member of Parliament of the Azalea Isles
- Defendant Ministry of State
Factual Allegations
- On January 27, 2026, the Ministry of State reached out to Aero Nox to ask questions as part of their execution of Parliamentary audits, as seen in the attached screenshot.
- Nowhere in the body of law for the Azalea Isles is the Ministry of State given the mandate to perform these audits.
- The Constitution clearly states that "Portfolios may be established through law to manage the following government responsibilities: justice, health, infrastructure, social services, public safety, trade, regulation, education and anything else established through the law."
- Section 4.b.i of the Governing Structures Act reaffirms this by stating "(i) These policies are subject to the laws and the Constitution of the Azalea Isles and cannot contravene them."
- Section 11 of the Governing Structures Act does not charge the Ministry of State with Parliamentary oversight.
- As such, the Ministry of State is operating outside the bounds of its Constitutional responsibilities.
As a direct result of the Ministry of Justice’s actions, the Plaintiff suffered:
- An improper exercise of Executive power against Parliament.
The Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court grant the following relief:
- The immediate cessation of all activities by the Ministry of State which are not defined in law, including but not limited to, Parliamentary audits.
- Any further relief the Court deems just and proper.