ShadowNBA vs RandomIntruder & Parliament

[The_Donuticus]

ShadowNBA, Plaintiff

v.

RandomIntruder, Defendant
&
Parliament, Defendant


Civil Complaint:

A member of Parliament exercises his legal right to abstain from the Parliament, in which he is Leader of the Opposition, the Parliament in which he does not believe in, due to its fascistic, authoritarian, and groupthink methods, this Parliament then seeks to create a law which would expressly target the member in question and remove them - the people elected the MP by a large majority, the rest of the MP's should not be able to vote him out of office just because he does not lick their boots and do what they demand.

ShadowNBA is the Leader of the Opposition, and the Majority in government seek to remove him from Parliament. This is a disgrace, this is undemocratic, and this is a serious crime.


Parties:

Plaintiff - ShadowNBA
Defendant - RandomIntruder
Co-Defendant(s) - All of Parliament


Factual Allegations:
In the following: (https://www.cityrp.org/threads/amendment-to-the-parliamentary-establishment-and-standards-act.60/) the Majority in government make clear their intentions to remove ShadowNBA from office - it is not stated in the bill, but comments in public betray that this is the purpose. This can be supported by their comments in public and in private, we file this case now and will over the course of this trial prove that all current members of Parliament are complicit in a conspiracy to deny rights to a large section of the people of the Isles. Given their control of the Ministry of Justice, we ask that the Prosecution be granted special dispensation to try all members of Parliament for criminal wrongdoing, alongside the issues raised in this trial, as this is the only way in which these criminal will face the Queen's justice.

Empower us to try for the Queen's justice your honor, we have a very plain case for 'Corruption' here your honor which we will pursue (In a separate court case) Please your honor, let justice have its day.

Legal Claims:
Very simply, ShadowNBA was elected on a certain platform - he is the only member of the opposition, as part of his elected mandate he can be expected to be allowed to abstain from discussion and votes. This is truly tyranny of the majority.

Prayer for Relief:
1. All illegal attempts to remove ShadowNBA from the Parliament are dropped and found to be acts of corruption.

Verification:
I, The_Donuticus, hereby affirm that the allegations in the complaint AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of the plaintiff's knowledge, information, and belief and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.

 

[The_Donuticus]

EMERGENCY INJUNCTION:

We ask that (https://www.cityrp.org/threads/amendment-to-the-parliamentary-establishment-and-standards-act.60/) is blocked and held in limbo until the end of this trial.

 

[Crumplesnatch]

Your honour, I ask that you disregard this case. All votes held specifically include an option for a member to abstain; by failing to vote he is not abstaining but failing is his duties as a member of parliament.

 

[The_Donuticus]

Objection:
This is an improper statement and Crumplesnatch has right to speak in this trial.

Motion to Strike:
The comments by Crumplesnatch - who is the Speaker of Parliament, the Highest Ranking Member - are not part of this case and made on a whim, they only serve to demonstrate the efforts of the Parliament to harm my client.

 

[Crumplesnatch]

A trial has not started yet, there are no motions?

And as "the highest ranking member of parliament" I am a codefendant in this case and thus have a significant part in this trial.

 

[The_Donuticus]

Motion for Sanctions:
Crumplesnatch is trying to cause a mess in this case, we filed the case and thus we deserve not to be bombarded with messages from persons such as himself. He should act more professionally, it is a shame he cannot. We ask that the court sanction him to establish that even though a judge has not responded you cannot bombard it with messages to prejudice and influence a jury.

 

[Crumplesnatch]

What jury? A trial hasn't started yet, and you haven't requested a jury trial take place

 

[The_Donuticus]

Motion for Sanctions:
This is completely outside court procedure, we beg to court to please bring order so that we can get a fair trial.

 

[MilkCrack]

The plaintiff is contending that a bill should it become law, could be used for a purpose that is not explicit in the bill which could potentially infringe upon an unclearly established right the plaintiff has to not vote on bills.

This contains too many hypotheticals, and therefore the court finds that the plaintiff lacks standing to bring such a suit at this time, as no actual damages or controversy exists at this moment.

For the reasons listed above this case is dismissed, without prejudice.

 

[MilkCrack]

For future reference, don't talk in the thread unless summoned and I will also caution any party from making editorial comments in this thread. Failing to adhere to the rules will result in a contempt of court charge.

 

[The_Donuticus]

This is an outrage your honor, there is only one hypothetical in this bill - if it becomes law it will be illegal, that is exactly why it is bring brought before the court today. This is one hypothetical, the court has only one choice, do your damn job.