Hello, Guest

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
What's new

Case: Pending robidemon2 v. Ministry of Justice (2025) CV 14

DK
Does the training guide mention whether or not a suspect needs to run away to constitute a proper pursuit?
What is Emerald’s rank within the legal state/MoJ?
Is their position responsible for changing the ambiguity of section 11 of the Criminal Code?
Is it their responsibility to find a universal interpretation of the law?


BeezerGeezer
Who was the owner of the plot at the time of the event?
Was the plaintiff an official owner of the farm at the time of the event?
Why did you let Robideman2 live on your farm?
Were you aware of his extensive criminal record, while sheltering him?
 
Objection Relevance
The following questions are irrelevant
Why did you let Robideman2 live on your farm?
Were you aware of his extensive criminal record, while sheltering him?
Is it their responsibility to find a universal interpretation of the law?
 
RealHanuta said:
DK
Does the training guide mention whether or not a suspect needs to run away to constitute a proper pursuit?
What is Emerald’s rank within the legal state/MoJ?
Is their position responsible for changing the ambiguity of section 11 of the Criminal Code?
Is it their responsibility to find a universal interpretation of the law?
Click to expand...
Does the training guide mention whether or not a suspect needs to run away to constitute a proper pursuit?

No

What is Emerald’s rank within the legal state/MoJ?

Police Officer

Is their position responsible for changing the ambiguity of section 11 of the Criminal Code?

Police Officers are not responsible for making or changing policies or the law.

Is it their responsibility to find a universal interpretation of the law?

No, that would be the job of a judge, Id imagine
 
Who was the owner of the plot at the time of the event?

I was renting the plot from MUD at time of the event.

Was the plaintiff an official owner of the farm at the time of the event?

The plaintiff was a worker and a shareholder of the company.
 
Objection, Your Honour, Unresponsive Answer
Bezzergeezer said:
The plaintiff was a worker and a shareholder of the company.
Click to expand...

The Defense askd that the Witness clarifies whether or not the plaintiff was an official owner of the plot.

Should this Objection be overruled, I ask that Your Honour let's me rephrase the question.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top