Case: Pending Nopu Catenjoyer vs Emil Emilozz (2026) CV 36

[xXLordLyonXx]

Nopu Catenjoyer, Plaintiff

v.

Emil Emilozz, Defendant


Civil Complaint:
The Defendant has infringed on the Plaintiff's intellectual property and copyright, protected by the Establish Copyright Protections Act.


Parties:
Plaintiff - Nopu Catenjoyer
Plaintiff's Counsel - Lysander Lyon
Defendant - Emil Emilozz


Factual Allegations:
(1) The Defendant's build uses the same color scheme and build structure as the Plaintiff's, including window placement and floor structure. The builds look near-identical, with the same tuff-decorated ground floor, same white window siding, same type of quartz used externally, and same lantern decorations for the bottom floor's exterior.
(2) The Plaintiff has the right to this build, as they hold an official copyright with the Ministry of Economic Affairs, and it existed as their intellectual property prior to the official registration of this copyright, pre-dating the Defendant's build.


Legal Claims:
(1) The Defendant's build is a near-identical copy of the Plaintiff's. There is no originality or independent intellectual creation involved in building a square replica and changing the flowers used, or removing flower decorations around the windows. As such, this is a violation of the Establish Copyright Protections Act, and the Plaintiff's rights under it. This is obvious by comparing the Plaintiff's build with the Defendant's directly, such as in the first two screenshots of the attached document.


Prayer for Relief:
(1) A demolition order for the build, under Section 6(a)ii(2) of the Establish Copyright Protections Act.
(2) Damages in the amount of $1,000, pursuant to the Damages Reform Act.
(3) $5,000 in additional reparations, under Section 6(a)iii of the Establish Copyright Protections Act, for the flagrance of this violation and since direct financial gain is not applicable to this case.


Verification:
I, Lysander Lyon, hereby affirm that the allegations in the complaint AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of the plaintiff's knowledge, information, and belief and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.


Evidence - The images were too large to attach, and can be found here.

The Plaintiff's copyright filing is also evidence for this case, and can be found here, with associated imagery.

 

[jotoho]

Writ of Summons

Azalea Isles District Court, Civil Case (CV)

Case No. CV-26-36
​

Plaintiff: Nopu Catenjoyer
Defendant: Emil Emilozz

​

The Defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of Nopu Catenjoyer v. Emil Emilozz (2026) CV 36. Failure to indicate your presence within 48 hours may result in a default judgement. Both parties are asked to familiarize themselves with the relevant court documents, including proper formats, as well as the laws referenced in the complaint. Ensure that you comply with any court orders.

Both parties are required to inform the Court whether they consent to hold this trial, in full or in part, at the Azalea Isles Courthouse in-person.
The Court will try to work with both parties to hold live hearings at convenient times.

​

Signed,
Hon. Judge Iturgen "jotoho" Bolir