Hello, Guest

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Case: Dismissed Members of i020 v. Ministry of Urban Development (2025) CV 10

RandomIntruder

Administrator
Staff member
Staff
Parliament Member
RandomIntruder
RandomIntruder
Citizen
Joined
Jun 23, 2024
Messages
21
Members of i020, Plaintiff

v.

Ministry of Urban Development, Defendant



Civil Complaint:

On August 17th, 2025, the constitutional rights of the Plaintiffs (consisting of AdmiralKenko, BlogWorldExpo, and kli_20) were violated in multiple ways when Minister of Urban Development, Death Thegreatfired, broke into i020, and ordered her employee, Cheeseeater77, to kill Blogy Wogy when he told them to leave.


Parties:

Plaintiff: Members of i020 (AdmiralKenko, BlogWorldExpo, and kli_20)
Defendant: Ministry of Urban Development


Factual Allegations:

- On the 17th of August, 2025, a citizen of the Isles, Nopuu, expressed concern that the pollution on her plot rendered her unable to plant potatoes. At this, MUD officials, along with Luke Thegreatfired, started trying to pinpoint the source of the pollution.

- Upon investigation using the pollution map, they pinpointed the source of the location to be i020, the plot of the plaintiffs.

- There was no way inside of the building without breaking blocks.

- Then, under the pretense of verifying the height of the building being compliant to MUD codes, Death Thegreatfired broke into the building.

- Blogy Wogy warned that they were to leave or he would start shooting.

- Death Thegreatfired then ordered Cheeseeater77 in voice call to kill Blogy Wogy, which he was successful in.

- There was, at that point, no active legislation regarding limiting pollution.

- There is no need to enter a building to check the height of a building, as the height is determined from the tallest point of the building exterior.

- According to the Property Regulation Guidance in the MUD forums, there is no regulation regarding anything inside of i plots being disallowed besides visible farms and animals from the exterior, rendering no reason for MUD to enter the building to check for any violation.

- There is no power granted to MUD or the MUD minister through the constitution or elsewhere to allow breaking of blocks in a build without a warrant or active report.

- There is no power granted to MUD or the MUD minister through the constitution or elsewhere to allow the hurt or kill of a citizen of the Isles.


Legal Claims:

The following constitutional freedoms were violated:
1) The right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure.
a) There was no warrant for the entry of the building nor any probable cause for an active violation that gave MUD the ability to break blocks in the building.
b) There was no reason to enter the building for the violation they claimed to be investigating.
2) The right against government overreach of powers not specified by the constitution.
a) Killing someone on their own property is a glaring abuse of government powers.
b) Breaking blocks in other people’s plots is a power only allowed to Death Thegreatfired because of her government position. It was a government overreach to use it to enter the building without a warrant.

Prayer for Relief:

Request the specific relief sought by the plaintiff, including monetary damages, injunctive relief, or other appropriate remedies. Please review the Court Orders, Powers, and Judgments thread for further explanation.

Prayer for relief goes here
1) An apology to AdmiralKenko for the breaking in of his plot.
2) $10,000 to each of the members of i020 for punitive and emotional damages for violation of constitutional freedoms.
3) $40,000 in legal fees.

Verification:

I, Random Intruder, hereby affirm that the allegations in the complaint AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of the plaintiff's knowledge, information, and belief and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.

Evidence:

Pictures below (the numbers are out of order sorry but this is the order I wish the evidence to be considered):
1.png - membership for i020
7.png - Death Thegreatfired outside of the plot of i020
2.png - The guise of height violation being used to justify the entering.
6.png - Luke Thegreatfired and Death Thegreatfired inside of i020.
3.png - Cheeseeater77 inside of i020.
4.png - A warning in chat by Blogy Wogy to vacate the premises or he will start shooting
5.png - Shows a report attempt for Cheeseeater77 after he killed Blogy Wogy
 

Attachments

  • 7.png
    7.png
    850.3 KB · Views: 14
  • 3.png
    3.png
    706.9 KB · Views: 13
  • 2.png
    2.png
    115.9 KB · Views: 14
  • 1.png
    1.png
    29.4 KB · Views: 14
  • 5.png
    5.png
    150.2 KB · Views: 13
  • 4.png
    4.png
    220.2 KB · Views: 12
  • 6.png
    6.png
    691.1 KB · Views: 12
Request for Emergency Injunction

In order to protect the freedoms of other citizens of Azalea Isles, the Plaintiffs request an Emergency Injunction against MUD to disallow breaking of blocks to enter buildings without a warrant for building regulation inspections until we determine they have this authority.
 
Last edited:
@RandomIntruder Counsel, in your filing you have presented this matter as a class action on behalf of "Members of i020," while specifically naming three individuals: Admiral Kenko (AdmiralKenko), Blogy Wogy (BlogWorldExpo) and Kli Astonmartin (kli_20). Before proceeding with a summons, I require clarification on two points:

1. What is the precise scope of the class identified as "Members of i020"?
2. Are the three named individuals similarly and equally affected by the alleged government action, and do they hold the same ownership or interest in i020?

The distinction matters, as the potential injury to a property owner may differ significantly from that of a non-owning member or associate. Clarifying will help the Court understand the standing presented here.
 
1. All three individuals listed are the people who are added to the i020 plot, as shown in the screenshot labeled 1.png.
2. The individuals are not equally affected. Blogy Wogy was online and killed by a member of MUD when the others weren't. Additionally, selling the plot would only pay Admiral Kenko. However, all three are equal in the sense that they all were given access to a space without any other stipulations (contracts etc) and are free to use the space, giving them equal interest in i020.
 
I would like to specify that the previous messages all referring to Blogy Wogy meaning BlogWorldExpo, who is now named Clanker Bot. These are to be assumed to be the same person.
 

Writ of Summons

Azalea Isles Civil Court (CV)


Case No. CV-25-10
Plaintiff: Members of i020 (Admiral Kenko [AdmiralKenko], Clanker Bot fmrly Blogy Wogy [BlogWorldExpo], and Kli Astonmartin [kli_20])
Defendant: Ministry of Urban Development
The Defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of Members of i020 v. Ministry of Urban Development. Failure to respond within 48 hours may result in a default judgement. Both parties are ask to familiarize themselves with the relevant court documents, including proper formats, as well as the laws referenced in the complaint. Ensure that you comply with any court orders.

If you wish to hold this trial at the Azalea Courthouse in-person, please note that in your response. The Court will try to work with both parties to hold live hearings at convenient times.
Signed,
Hon. Chief Justice Raymond West
 
Before proceeding to respond to the complaint, the Defendant is entitled to challenge the class certification in this case under the Civil Suit Reform Act, §3.ii. The Defendant has 48 hours, the time of summons, to provide their rebuttal on whether or not these Plaintiffs should be considered a class in the case.

Once a response has been provided, or the deadline has elapsed, the Court will rule on whether the case can move forward with the class as "Members of i020."
 
Last edited:
Your Honor,

The Civil Suit Reform Act, under Section 2c, requires individuals who wish to sue as a class all be harmed similarly. However, the counsel for the Plaintiffs has clearly alleged differing harms and levels of harm for each suggested member of the class.

The three do not have equal interest in this case, nor were they equally harmed, by any metric. The complaint alleges that Clanker Bot (Blogy Wogy) was killed on government orders. This allegation is not made for Admiral Kenko and Kli Astonmartin; government-sanctioned murder is a fundamentally different level of alleged harm than what has been alleged for Kenko or Astonmartin, so Clanker Bot cannot be certified as a member of the class.

Furthermore, counsel has already identified yet another separating characteristic: the only individual who actually owns the plot is Admiral Kenko. The alleged trespass or any alleged violations would be against Admiral Kenko, the property owner - Astonmartin and Bot do not, by virtue of simply being added to the plot to use it as a common space, suddenly inherit the same legal rights and claims as the only actual owner.

Finally, counsel has already clearly stated their lawsuit is a violation of Sections 2c and 3a(i) of the Civil Suit Reform Act, when they stated "The individuals are not equally affected." in response to Your Honor's questions.

Thus, we move for immediate dismissal, on the grounds that the filed complaint is on behalf of an illegitimate class.
 
I'm afraid that I must point to the Civil Suit Reform Act, which is is unambiguous on this issue, stating under §3c that "Individuals who wish to sue as a class, known as a class action lawsuit, must all be harmed similarly by the party they are suing"

In this matter, the alleged unlawful entry by officials from the Ministry of Urban Development would subject the property owner to fines or potential eviction. The added members of the plot would not need to pay these fines. As pointed out by the Defence, there are different levels of alleged harm here. Mere association with the property does not confer the same right to compensatory relief as ownership does.

As provided by their lawyer's own omission, it is stated that these Plaintiffs are "not equally affected" and therefore cannot be certified as a class under the current legislation.

This case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Counsel is welcome to re-file a new case of the same facts if they can provide a class of Plaintiffs that are compliant with current legislation, or if they would like to file individual cases that address the different alleged harms for each Plaintiff.
 
Back
Top