Case: Pending KimiJungUn v. Ministry of Justice

[Anthony_org]

Plaintiff: KimiJungUn

Defendant: Ministry of Justice

---

Introduction​

This is a civil action brought by the Plaintiff, KimiJungUn, against the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) for an unlawful arrest and charge of Assault lacking factual and evidentiary basis. The Ministry of Justice arrested and penalized the Plaintiff despite the absence of any demonstrable harm, damage, or qualifying assault under CityRP standards, constituting government overreach and a violation of constitutional protections.

---

Factual Allegations​

1. On January 19, 2026, the Ministry of Justice filed Indictment #208 (Exhibit A) against the Plaintiff, charging him with Assault x1.
2. The arresting officer alleged that the Plaintiff “whacked” the officer multiple times.
3. As punishment, the Plaintiff was sentenced to 5 minutes jail time and fined $50.
4. The sole piece of evidence submitted by the Ministry of Justice was a screenshot taken from the officer’s point of view.
5. Said screenshot explicitly displays the Minecraft HUD showing zero hearts lost, indicating no damage was taken by the alleged victim.
6. The Ministry of Justice nevertheless proceeded with arrest, charge, punishment, and record entry.

---

Constitutional Violations​

Violation of Article 1 – Fundamental Protections​

Article 1, Section 10 guarantees protection against government overreach of powers not specified by law.

The Ministry of Justice exercised punitive authority absent:

• Proof of harm
• Proof of injury
• Proof of a completed assault

Punishment was imposed solely on allegation, contradicting constitutional safeguards.

Violation of Article 1, Section 9 – Right to Self-Representation or Counsel​

Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution of Azalea Isles guarantees every citizen “the right to self-representation or counsel in a court of law.”

In this matter, the Plaintiff was arrested, charged, fined, jailed, and recorded criminally without being afforded any meaningful opportunity to contest the charge, seek counsel, or represent himself before punishment was imposed.

The Ministry of Justice executed a summary punishment based solely on an officer allegation, bypassing:

• Judicial review
• Evidentiary challenge
• The Plaintiff’s right to defend himself

Such conduct effectively nullifies Article 1, Section 9, reducing the right to counsel or self-representation to a nullity whenever the Ministry of Justice elects to act unilaterally.

---

Failure of Evidence​

The Ministry of Justice’s own submitted evidence disproves the charge:

• The interface shows no hearts lost

The "Fight initiated" message cannot prove the Plaintiff committed assault. The screenshot was 25 seconds after the alleged assault took place (fight initiated timer is 45 seconds as shown in Exhibit B) which gives the reporting officer plenty of time to leave safe zones such as spawn.

As such, the charge is factually unsustainable.

---

Legal Claim​

Unlawful Arrest and Punishment by the Ministry of Justice

The Plaintiff was arrested, fined, jailed, and recorded criminally without factual cause, in violation of constitutional protections.

---

Damages​

As a direct result of the Ministry of Justice’s actions, the Plaintiff suffered:

• Wrongful loss of liberty (jail time)
• Financial loss ($50 fine)
• Reputational harm via criminal record entry
• Improper exercise of state power against a citizen

---

Prayer for Relief​

The Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court grant the following relief:

1. Immediate expungement of Indictment #208 from the Plaintiff’s criminal record
2. Compensatory damages of $550 ($50 fine + $1 per second in jail)
3. Punitive damages of $10,000
4. Any further relief the Court deems just and proper

---

Exhibits

Exhibit A

Exhibit B

---

Verification​

I, Anthony Org, affirm that the facts stated in this filing are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that any false statement may be subject to penalty under CityRP law.