Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of CityRP.

SignUp Now!

Latest posts

Case: Pending Budgiebud v. Ministry of Justice (2026) CV 06

Westray said:
We are now moving forward to the next stage of the trial, which involves witness testimony.

Both parties have 48 hours to provide a list of witnesses they wish to call, or to indicate to the Court that they would like to move forward without calling any witnesses.

@Anthony_org @RandomIntruder
Click to expand...
Your honor, I would like to call Aero to provide a witness testimony
 

Writ of Summons - Witnesses

Azalea Isles District Court, Civil Case (CV)

Case No. CV-26-06

Plaintiff: No Name (Budgiebud)
Defendant: Ministry of Justice
​
The following individuals are required to appear before the court:
  • Aero Nox (Aeronox4)​
Please indicate your presence in this thread. Failure to respond within 72 hours may result in contempt of court.
​
Signed,
Hon. Justice Raymond West
​
 
Your witness, counsel. The Plaintiff has 48 hours to provide questions to Aero Nox.
 
@Aero

1. You've had issues with the policing plugin in the past. Can you explain in detail what happened?

2. How did the MoJ respond to the situation?
 
1. Due to an issue with police technology, I was jailed twice for the same crime. I attempted to defend myself and clarify with the arresting officer that I had already served out my sentence, only to be called a liar. I was never given the opportunity to provide my evidence and was simply tossed in jail, without a trial.

2. I opened a ticket with the Ministry of Justice and provided my evidence showing that an error had been made. The Ministry admitted the error, but hid behind the alleged absolute truth of police technology. Despite clear evidence showing that it had provided untruthful evidence. The Ministry failed to find a settlement with me to their pure stubbornness. This issue remains unresolved to this day.
 
Aero said:
1. Due to an issue with police technology, I was jailed twice for the same crime. I attempted to defend myself and clarify with the arresting officer that I had already served out my sentence, only to be called a liar. I was never given the opportunity to provide my evidence and was simply tossed in jail, without a trial.

2. I opened a ticket with the Ministry of Justice and provided my evidence showing that an error had been made. The Ministry admitted the error, but hid behind the alleged absolute truth of police technology. Despite clear evidence showing that it had provided untruthful evidence. The Ministry failed to find a settlement with me to their pure stubbornness. This issue remains unresolved to this day.
Click to expand...
3. Why is this issue still unresolved, has the ministry at any point made you feel like you cannot contest or protect your constitutional rights?
 
3. Yes. I was made to feel like I had no legal recourse because of their assertion that police technology was incapable of being wrong. I made a settlement offer, which they rejected. They made a counter-offer which I can only describe as offensive.
 
Aero said:
3. Yes. I was made to feel like I had no legal recourse because of their assertion that police technology was incapable of being wrong. I made a settlement offer, which they rejected. They made a counter-offer which I can only describe as offensive.
Click to expand...
4. What was the counter-offer?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top