Biscuit Cookie v. Azalea Isles

[Aero]

Biscuit Cookie, Plaintiff
v.
Azalea Isles, Defendant​

Complaint​

Minster of Justice Dogan Karaca has erroneously informed Parliament that Member of Parliament Biscuit Cookie committed a sanctionable offense under the Upstanding MPs Act.

---

Parties:​

• Plaintiff: Biscuit Cookie
• Defendant: Azalea Isles

---

Factual Allegations:​

(All dates and time are in Eastern Daylight Time, which is UTC-4.)

1. On May 21, 2026, Member of Parliament Biscuit Cookie is alleged to have committed the crime of Bank Robbery. (Exhibit P-001)​

​

2. MP Biscuit Cookie never made an admission of guilt for this alleged crime.​

​

3. MP Biscuit Cookie was never found guilty by the Judiciary.​

​

4. Section 2(d) of the Upstanding MPs Act clearly states "For a crime to be countable for sanctions under this Act, the perpetrator must have admitted to the deed or been found guilty by the Judiciary."​

​

5. On May 21, 2026, despite failing to meet the threshold set by Section 2(d) of the Upstanding MPs Act, Minister Karaca informed Parliament that MP Cookie had committed the crime of Bank Robbery. (Exhibit P-002)​

​

6. MP Cookie faces an imminent threat of suspension from Parliament, despite Minister Karaca's failure to meet the threshold set in Section 2(d) of the Upstanding MPs Act.​

---

Legal Claims:​

I. Upstanding MPs Act

Section 2(d) of the Upstanding MPs Act sets a clear threshold for what constitutes a crime that is "countable for sanctions under this Act".

​

---

Prayer for Relief:​

1. A declaratory judgment that Minister Karaca did not meet the threshold set in Section 2(d) and illegally informed Parliament.​

​

2. A permanent injunction enjoining the Minister of Justice from illegally informing Parliament without meeting the threshold set out by Section 2(d) of the Upstanding MPs Act.​

2. Award costs, reasonable attorneys’ fees, and such further relief as the Court deems just and proper.​

---

Verification:​

I, Aero Nox, hereby affirm that the allegations in the complaint AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of the plaintiff's knowledge, information, and belief and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.

Evidence​

Spoiler: Exhibit P-001

Spoiler: Exhibit P-002

 

[Aero]

MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUCTION

Your Honour, Plaintiff moves the Court to enjoin Parliament from moving forward with the process to sanction MP Cookie until this matter is resolved. A sanction would mean that MP Cookie is suspended from Parliament for up to a week, unable to perform his duly elected constitutional duties. MP Cookie would be denied his right to debate, propose motions and vote. These damages would be irreparable.