Case: Pending Biscuit Cookie v. Azalea Isles (2026) CV 28

[BiscuitPlaysYT]

Your Honor,

The defense has provided evidence for the submission of D-003; the screenshots may take a minute to load. Additionally, D-003 is providing contextual evidence to support comments made by the government. The Defense asks that the motion to suppress evidence be denied.

Your Honour,
The plaintiff would like the court to remind the defendant, this case is about whether the plaintiff (Biscuit Cookie) was slandered by the defendant (Azalea Isles). The plaintiff doesn’t understand how this evidence is relevant to the case.

 

[SHIELD_Hand3]

Your Honour,
The plaintiff would like the court to remind the defendant, this case is about whether the plaintiff (Biscuit Cookie) was slandered by the defendant (Azalea Isles). The plaintiff doesn’t understand how this evidence is relevant to the case.

Your Honor,

The defense is well aware of why we are here and what the purpose of the case is. The Plaintiff made an allegation, the defense disagreed with their allegation, and attached evidence to support our disagreement with the allegation. The evidence is relevant to the case because it supports a disagreement the defense has with an allegation made by the plaintiff. The defense once again asks that the evidence not be suppressed, as it is relevant to the case at hand, and it relates to an allegation made by the plaintiff.