Case: Pending Antonio Moratti and MorattiCapitalHoldings v. TheMusica(2026)

[drfunks]

Antonio Moratti and MorattiCapitalHoldings, Plaintiffs
v.
TheMusica, Defendant​

Civil Complaint:​

Plaintiffs Antonio Moratti and MorattiCapitalHoldings allege that Defendant TheMusica made false and damaging public statements about Plaintiffs’ bank, MorattiCapitalHoldings, in order to drive away its workers and customers.

Parties:​

Plaintiffs: Antonio Moratti; MorattiCapitalHoldings
Defendant: TheMusica

Factual Allegations:
1. On 10/31/26, Defendant stated in global chat, visible to everyone on the server: “Downed is a ponzi and everything on the paper.” (Exhibit P-001)
2. On 10/15/26, Plaintiff Antonio Moratti was speaking with a individual named Isakdrage, explaining the benefits of working at MorattiCapitalHoldings.
3. Defendant then interjected: “this sounds like a scam, I will not take any parts in this.” Isakdrage immediately withdrew, replying: “then I don’t think I will sorry antonio.” (Exhibit P-002)
4. On the same day, 10/15/26, Defendant again disparaged Plaintiffs’ business while Plaintiff Moratti was attempting to recruit BobTheNPC, saying: “Still selling your scam?” (Exhibit P-003)

Legal Claims:​

1. All three Exhibits constitute slander.
a. In section 1(a) in the Anti-Slander Act, we see that it's defined as "Slander is defined as making false and damaging statements about someone."
2. Section 3(a) seeing in the Anti-Slander Act "An individual may sue for slander."
3. As for Section 3(b), we have proved in the Factual Allegations 1-4 that there has been damages done.
4. Intent to damage the Plaintiff.
a. Under 3(c) of the Anti-Slander Act, we are required to "In addition to proving damages, the plaintiff must also prove the defendant's intent to damage their reputation.". We can see this in Exhibit P-004, P-005, P-006, P-007 we can see the distaste that TheMusica has for the Plaintiff, and the want to damage their reputation.

Prayer for Relief:​

1. Compensation for damages for Defendants slander against the Plaintiff, under the Anti-Slander Act, the compensation will be decided by the Judge as seen in Anti-Slander Act section 4(a-c).
2. Costs for attorney's fees
3. Then whatever the court deems fit within this case.

Verification:​

I, Dr Lee Funks, hereby affirm that the allegations in the complaint AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of the plaintiff's knowledge, information, and belief and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.

Spoiler: Exhibit P-001

Spoiler: Exhibit P-002

Spoiler: Exhibit P-003

Spoiler: Exhibit P-004

Spoiler: Exhibit P-006

Spoiler: Exhibit P-007