Case: Dismissed Dayvon Hamilton v. Ministry of Justice

[Agentsquid2012]

Dayvon Hamilton, Plaintiff
v.
Ministry of Justice, Defendant


Civil Complaint:
Plaintiff submitted a job application to the Ministry of Justice on June 5, 2025 under the name Dayvon Bennet. The Ministry failed to provide a formal response within one week as required by the Government Application Response Act. The only communication received was an informal comment that does not satisfy the statutory requirement. The application remains unresolved over one year later. Plaintiff brings this civil action to recover all accumulated fees owed under the Act.


Parties:
Plaintiff: Dayvon Hamilton, formerly known as Dayvon Parentless, Dayvon Karaca, Dayvon Cookie, Dayvon Parentless, and prior to all of those Dayvon Bennet, applicant and victim of non-compliance, self represented
Defendant: Ministry of Justice, the Ministry responsible for responding to the application


Factual Allegations:

1. On June 5, 2025 at 8:33 PM, Plaintiff, then operating under the name Dayvon Bennet, submitted a job application to the Ministry of Justice for the position of Police Officer as evidenced by Exhibit P-001.
2. Plaintiff has since changed their name on multiple occasions, operating successively under the names Dayvon Parentless, Dayvon Cookie, Dayvon Karaca, Dayvon Parentless again, and currently Dayvon Hamilton. These name changes do not affect the validity of the original application or the obligations of the Ministry of Justice under the Government Application Response Act. The Plaintiff is the same individual throughout and the application submitted on June 5, 2025 remains the subject of this complaint.
3. Under Section 2(a) of the Government Application Response Act, all Ministries must provide a response consisting of acceptance, rejection, or a request for additional information within one week of receipt. The statutory deadline for a formal response to Plaintiff's application was therefore June 12, 2025.
4. On June 9, 2025 at 12:25 AM, four days after submission, a representative of the Ministry identified as Fauz stated the following as evidenced by Exhibit P-001: "not forgotten about am waiting for more good non murderous behavior." This statement does not constitute a formal response under the Act for the following reasons:
   (a) It is not an acceptance of the application.
   (b) It is not a rejection of the application.
   (c) It is not a formal request for additional information. A valid request for additional information under Section 2(b) of the Act must specify what information is required, provide clear and measurable criteria for compliance, and establish a formal process for the applicant to satisfy the request. A vague informal comment about behavioral expectations with no specific criteria, no deadline, and no formal process does not meet this standard.
5. No formal response was ever provided to the Plaintiff within the required one week window ending June 12, 2025.
6. On July 28, 2025 at 10:52 PM, Plaintiff followed up on the application asking whether their behavior had improved sufficiently, as evidenced by Exhibit P-001. This follow up received no response whatsoever.
7. The application remains unresolved to this day with no formal acceptance, rejection, or valid request for additional information ever having been issued by the Ministry of Justice.
8. Under Section 3(b) of the Government Application Response Act, each missed response deadline constitutes a separate violation. The Ministry has been in continuous non-compliance since June 12, 2025.
9. As of July 23, 2026, the Ministry of Justice has been in non-compliance for approximately 56 weeks, constituting 56 separate violations under the Act totaling $14,000 in accumulated fees.

Legal Claims:

1. Failure to Respond under Section 2(a) of the Government Application Response Act. The Ministry of Justice failed to provide a formal response to Plaintiff's job application within one week of receipt as evidenced by Exhibit P-001. The informal comment made by Fauz on June 9, 2025 does not satisfy the statutory requirement of an acceptance, rejection, or formal request for additional information. It is a vague informal statement with no specific criteria, no deadline, and no formal process, and therefore cannot be construed as a valid response under the Act.
2. Accumulated Fee Liability under Section 3(a) and Section 3(b) of the Government Application Response Act. Each missed response deadline constitutes a separate violation carrying a $250 fee. The Ministry has been in continuous non-compliance since June 12, 2025. As of July 23, 2026 this amounts to 56 separate violations totaling $14,000, with additional violations accumulating at $250 per week until a formal response is issued or judgment is entered.

Prayer for Relief:
The Plaintiff requests that the Court grant the following:

1. A finding that the Ministry of Justice violated Section 2(a) of the Government Application Response Act by failing to provide a formal response to Plaintiff's application within one week of receipt.
2. A finding that the informal comment made by Fauz on June 9, 2025 does not constitute a valid formal response under Section 2(b) of the Act.
3. Payment of $250 per violation for each week of non-compliance from June 12, 2025 to the date of judgment. As of July 23, 2026 this amounts to approximately 56 separate violations totaling $14,000, with additional violations accumulating at $250 per week until a formal response is issued or judgment is entered.
4. A court order requiring the Ministry of Justice to formally respond to Plaintiff's application within 48 hours of judgment.
5. Any additional relief the Court deems appropriate given the extraordinary duration of this non-compliance spanning over one year.

Evidence:
Exhibit P-001: Screenshot of the original application thread showing the application date of June 5, 2025, the informal comment from Fauz on June 9, 2025, and the unanswered follow up from Plaintiff on July 28, 2025.


Verification:
I, Dayvon Hamilton, formerly known as Dayvon Parentless, Dayvon Karaca, Dayvon Cookie, Dayvon Parentless, and Dayvon Bennet, hereby affirm that the allegations in the complaint AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of the plaintiff's knowledge, information, and belief and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.

 

[Agentsquid2012]

Your Honor,

I respectfully move to voluntarily dismiss this case on the grounds of ignorance, poor decision-making, and the sudden realization that I may have been the problem all along. After further review, the Plaintiff has decided not to proceed with this matter and requests that the Court close this filing before it receives a case number. I shall now make a strategic retreat - commonly known as running away before this gets worse.

 

[jotoho]

Your Honor,

I respectfully move to voluntarily dismiss this case on the grounds of ignorance, poor decision-making, and the sudden realization that I may have been the problem all along. After further review, the Plaintiff has decided not to proceed with this matter and requests that the Court close this filing before it receives a case number. I shall now make a strategic retreat - commonly known as running away before this gets worse.

At the request of the Plaintiff, this case is dismissed without prejudice.