Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of CityRP.

SignUp Now!

Latest posts

Nara v. Ognqn

Agentsquid2012

New member
AgentSquid2012
AgentSquid2012
Citizen
Joined
Jun 23, 2025
Messages
17
Thread Title: Nara v. Ognqn


Nara, Plaintiffv.Ognqn, Defendant


Civil Complaint:Plaintiff was trespassed upon, assaulted, murdered, and stolen from by Defendant using an iron axe on residential plot r016, resulting in $70 in stolen property. As the government provides no mechanism for victims to recover stolen funds through criminal proceedings alone, Plaintiff brings this civil action to seek restitution directly.


Plaintiff — Nara, victim of trespassing, assault, murder, and theft, represented by Dayvon CookieDefendant — Ognqn, the individual who carried out the alleged attacks


Factual Allegations:


  1. The incident occurred on residential plot r016, a residential property owned by and under the control of Plaintiff.
  2. Defendant entered Plaintiff's plot r016 without authorization or permission, constituting trespassing under §5(a) of the New Criminal Code Act.
  3. While unlawfully present on Plaintiff's property, Defendant attacked Plaintiff using an iron axe, inflicting bodily harm and ultimately killing Plaintiff.
  4. Defendant stole $70 worth of property from Plaintiff during or following the attack.
  5. The government's criminal enforcement process does not provide a restitution mechanism for victims to recover stolen funds, leaving civil action as the only available remedy for Plaintiff's financial loss.
  6. Evidence available includes witness accounts and any available server logs or screenshots.

Legal Claims:


  1. Trespassing — under §5(a) of the New Criminal Code Act, Defendant made unauthorized and intentional entry onto Plaintiff's residential plot r016 without permission or legal right to do so.
  2. Assault — under §4(c) of the New Criminal Code Act, Defendant inflicted bodily harm of 3 or more hearts of damage upon Plaintiff without consent or lawful justification.
  3. Murder — under §4(a) of the New Criminal Code Act, Defendant killed Plaintiff without consent and outside of self-defense.
  4. Theft — under §4(e) of the New Criminal Code Act, Defendant unlawfully took $70 in property from Plaintiff through force. As no government restitution mechanism exists, civil recovery is the only available remedy.

Prayer for Relief:The Plaintiff requests that the Court grant full restitution of $70 in stolen property, civil damages for trespassing, assault, and murder, and any additional relief the Court deems appropriate given the nature and severity of the attack.


Verification:I, Dayvon Cookie, counsel for Plaintiff Nara, hereby affirm that the allegations in the complaint AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of the plaintiff's knowledge, information, and belief and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2026-06-10 at 4.53.00 AM.png
    Screenshot 2026-06-10 at 4.53.00 AM.png
    22.1 KB · Views: 6
  • 2026-06-10_16.08.14.png
    2026-06-10_16.08.14.png
    186.5 KB · Views: 5
  • 2026-06-10_16.08.03.png
    2026-06-10_16.08.03.png
    304 KB · Views: 5
  • 2026-06-10_16.07.44.png
    2026-06-10_16.07.44.png
    297.8 KB · Views: 5
  • Screenshot 2026-06-10 at 5.26.17 AM.png
    Screenshot 2026-06-10 at 5.26.17 AM.png
    80.5 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:
Do I give a fuck?Do I careIs the world sunshine and lollipops?Is the murder true
Ognqn❎❎✅❎
 
Back
Top