Hello, Guest

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Azalea Isles v. Omreta_Bank

fauzfauzfauz

Moderator
Staff
Parliament Member
fauzfauzfauz
fauzfauzfauz
Citizen
Joined
Feb 16, 2025
Messages
50
Fauz Wolfe/Ministry of Justice, Prosecution

v.

Ormeta_Bank, Defendant


Civil Complaint:

The Defendant company has falsely been in operation as a bank for several days, and has already taken in at least a couple hundred thousand dollars under this pretense. However, as the Defendant’s owner was made aware of on two occasions, operating as a bank requires registration, and the bank was not registered. While we are separately prosecuting the bank owner responsible for the fraud, the fact remains that this company is in violation of the Financial Institution Establishment Act, has been wrongfully evading taxes, and has been part of deceiving citizens.

Parties:
1. Prosecution, Fauz Wolfe
2. Co-Counsel, Lysander Lyon
3. Defendant, Dayvon Bennett


Factual Allegations:
1. Dayvon Bennett, one of the listed owners, was informed of the need to register his bank in Exhibit A.
2. Dayvon Bennett knew his company did not receive registration from the Ministry of Economic Affairs, seen in Exhibit B.
3. Omreta_Bank has continued to operate as a bank in-game, despite not being registered as one. This has led to the company wrongfully not paying taxes, while of course by nature engaging in deceit by advertising itself as a bank when it is not, seen in Exhibit D.

Evidence:

Exhibit A: Conversation with the Minister of Urban Development, where Dayvon Bennet is informed of needing to register his bank officially.Screenshot_20250805_203328_Discord.jpeg

Exhibit B: This shows Dayvon Bennet attempting to register his bank, but being rejected. The reply with the Bulletin channel explains that no new financial institutions will be registered until the Rebuild Banking Act receives royal assent, see Exhibit C.
94B6DD8A-2F75-48EE-9966-4E1B5EFDBFE1.jpeg

Exhibit C: The bulletin message referenced in the above exhibit.
ED2DAEB2-EE4A-4D26-9CA7-2CAA737D838D.jpeg

Exhibit D: Balance of Omreta_Bank, proving tax evasion.
Screenshot_2025-08-05_194932.jpg

Legal Claims:
1. The Defendant has incorrectly claimed tax-exempt status and operated as a bank without being registered.
2. This court has the power to issue a subpoena, which will enable the Government to request the transaction logs of Ormeta_Bank from staff.
3. The extensive criminal record of one of the owners warrants investigation of financial records.

Prayer For Relief:
1. A court-issued subpoena granting the Government the authority to pull Ormeta_Bank’s transaction logs, to investigate the operations of the company while it has misrepresented itself as a bank.
2. Punitive damages in the amount of $10,000, as a government fine for falsely acting as a bank and evading taxes.

Verification:
I, Fauz Wolfe, hereby affirm that the allegations in the complaint AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.
 
Back
Top