- Joined
- Jun 24, 2024
- Messages
- 15
Your honor,
The prosecution would like to call Elaina, the Minister of Justice as a witness to help provide some insight as to the defendants' intent.
There will be no further witnesses called as our attempts to investigate further into bank records and direct messages were either shut down by the court or were not fruitful. Additionally, the chance to question the candidates and parliament members, explicitly named by the defendant in their #ads was also denied.
However, let me be clear, the prosecution is still pursuing charges for the attempted bribery, and the incitement of corruption charges as outlined in the complaint, and detailed in the criminal code.
Furthermore, we would like to admit into evidence the following :
In the Court of the Azalea Isles
Motion to Supress Evidence
Your honour,
The Defence raises objection to the evidence presented by the Prosecution. Specifically, we ask the Court to:
1. Strike "Evidence B" from the record as it poses no relevance to the case. This is a screenshot taken on April 24, prior to the election of any Parliament, prior to the opening of the city, and prior to the events of this case. The quote "who am I bribing?" was clearly a humorous remark noted by the Defendant several months ago. For the Prosecution to attempt to use this as evidence is to significantly mislead the court. In addition, such evidence goes far beyond the lawful statute of limitations.
2. Strike "Evidence D" and "Evidence E" from the record as it poses no relevance to the case. These are screenshots of advertisements made by the Progressive Coalition of Azalea (PCA). At no point did the Defendant ever express support for or connection to the PCA. The Defendant has also already provided their own evidence proving no direct message interaction with any of the six PCA MPs.
Thank you for your time and consideration.