Case: Pending Azalea Isles v. Darthhkid (2026) CR XX

[multiman155]

Azalea Isles, Prosecution

v.

darthhkid, Defendant​

Criminal Complaint:​

On September 22, 2026, darthhkid offered to sell Wish Coolperson (Wish13) two Halloween keys for $500. Wish13 paid him. Defendant then withheld the keys. He told her she had fallen for a trick. Wish13 later reported to the Ministry of Justice that a friend had recovered one key. She reported that the second key was still missing.

Azalea Isles charges Defendant with one count of Criminal Fraud under Section 9(a) of the New Criminal Code Act.

Parties:​

1. Prosecution: Azalea Isles (represented by Multi Man for the Ministry of Justice).
2. Defendant: darthhkid.

Factual Allegations:​

1. On September 22, 2026, in the Azalea Isles, Defendant offered to sell Ms. Wish Coolperson (hereafter "Wish13") two Halloween keys for $500 total. (Exhibits P-001 and P-005.)
2. Wish13 accepted the offer. (Exhibit P-001.)
3. Wish13 told Defendant she expected to receive the keys after paying. (Exhibit P-001.)
4. Defendant confirmed that the offer covered both keys. (Exhibit P-001.)
5. Wish13 transferred $500 to Defendant. (Exhibits P-001 and P-002.)
6. Defendant withheld the keys after Wish13 paid. (Exhibit P-002.)
7. Defendant told Wish13, "you fell for the oldest trick." (Exhibit P-002.)
8. Wish13 demanded the keys. (Exhibit P-002.)
9. Defendant refused to hand over the keys. (Exhibit P-002.)
10. Defendant encouraged other players to ignore Wish13. (Exhibit P-002.)
11. Defendant said he was saving a key for someone else. (Exhibit P-003.)
12. Ms. Kacy Carlisle told Defendant she did not want to buy keys Defendant was supposed to give to Wish13. (Exhibit P-003.)
13. Defendant then claimed he was saving the keys for Kacy. (Exhibit P-003.)
14. Later, Kacy Carlisle told Wish13 she had obtained a key for her. (Exhibit P-004.)
15. Defendant asked for money. (Exhibit P-004.)
16. Kacy reminded Defendant that Wish13 had already paid. (Exhibit P-004.)
17. Defendant replied, "I FAILED TO SCAM YOU." (Exhibit P-004.)
18. On September 24, 2026, Wish13 reported to the Ministry of Justice that a friend had recovered one key from Defendant. (Exhibit P-005.)
19. In that report, she stated that the second key was still missing. (Exhibit P-005.)
20. On September 25, Wish13 confirmed that the agreed price was $500 for both keys. (Exhibit P-005.)
21. The prosecution alleges that Defendant offered the keys to get Wish13 to pay $500 without intending to hand them over. (Exhibits P-001 through P-004.)

Legal Claims:​

Count 1: Criminal Fraud — New Criminal Code Act, Section 9(a).

Pursuant to Section 9(a) of the New Criminal Code Act, a person commits a felony when that person "intentionally deceives or misleads another person or entity for financial gain, including false representation, concealment of material facts, or deliberate misstatements intended to deprive someone of property, money, or services". The Act enacted on February 20, 2026 already contained this offense when the alleged conduct occurred on September 22, 2026.

A. Defendant made a false offer to Wish13.

Defendant offered two Halloween keys to Wish13 in exchange for $500. Wish13 told him she expected to receive the keys after paying. Defendant confirmed that the offer covered both keys. The prosecution alleges that this offer was false when made because Defendant intended to obtain her money without handing over the keys. (Factual Allegations 1–4 and 21; Exhibit P-001.)

B. Defendant intended to deceive Wish13 when he sought payment.

The prosecution alleges that Defendant's statements about a trick and a scam reveal his purpose in asking Wish13 to pay. It relies on his refusal to hand over the keys as further evidence that the offer was dishonest when he made it. (Factual Allegations 6–9, 17, and 21; Exhibits P-002 and P-004.)

Defendant said he was saving the keys for someone else. The prosecution relies on that statement as further evidence that he intended to withhold them from Wish13. (Factual Allegations 11–13; Exhibit P-003.)

C. Defendant obtained money through the alleged deception.

Wish13 paid Defendant the $500 he requested for the two keys. The prosecution alleges that his false offer caused her to make that payment. The $500 was his financial gain from the alleged deception. (Factual Allegations 1–5 and 21; Exhibits P-001 and P-002.)

D. The charge concerns a completed fraud arising from one sale.

The prosecution alleges that Defendant completed the fraud when he obtained the $500 through his false offer. This count covers the single transaction for both keys.

Section 9(a)(ii) provides for full restitution. The prosecution credits the key Wish13 reported recovering. It seeks $250 for the missing key, calculated as half of the agreed $500 price. The prayer also credits any further refund or delivery before judgment. (Factual Allegations 18–20; Exhibit P-005.)

E. The Ministry may prosecute this charge in the District Court.

Sections 8(a)(i) and (v) of the Governing Structure Act authorize the Ministry of Justice to operate the prosecutor's office and prosecute on behalf of the Government.

Section 13(b) of the New Criminal Code Act requires felonies to be prosecuted in court. The District Court has jurisdiction under Sections 2(b) and 3(a) of the Judiciary Act.

Filing this charge in November 2026 falls within the six-month period under Section 13(d) of the New Criminal Code Act for the alleged offense on September 22, 2026.

Prayer for Relief:​

1. Find Defendant guilty of one count of Criminal Fraud under Section 9(a) of the New Criminal Code Act.
2. Under Section 9(a)(ii), impose a $1,000 fine and up to 30 minutes in jail.
3. Order Defendant to pay Wish13 $250 in restitution for the missing key, half of the agreed $500 price. Credit Defendant for any further refund or delivery of the missing key before judgment.

Evidence:​

Spoiler: Exhibit P-001

Spoiler: Exhibit P-002

Spoiler: Exhibit P-003

Spoiler: Exhibit P-004

Spoiler: Exhibit P-005

Verification:​

I, Multi Man, hereby affirm that the allegations in the complaint and all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of the prosecution's knowledge, information, and belief and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.