Hello, Guest

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
What's new

Search results

  1. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Azalea Isles v. Galavance (2025) CR 03

    The Court thanks the Defendant for their answer to the complaint. The Prosecution now has 48 hours to provide an opening statement to the court.
  2. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Azalea Isles v. Galavance (2025) CR 03

    Since no specific timeframe was specified in the request, the Court will be providing the Defendant with an extension of 48 hours while they seek out legal counsel. This will be in addition to the previous 48 hour notice, providing 96 hours from the summons in total.
  3. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Azalea Isles v. Galavance (2025) CR 03

    Writ of Summons Azalea Isles Criminal Court (CR) Case No. CR-25-03 Prosecutor: Omega Biebel (Omegabiebel) Defendant: Gala Hamilton (Galavance) The Defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of Azalea Isles v. Galavance. Failure to respond within 48 hours may result in a...
  4. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Azalea Isles v. Luke201556 (2025) CR 02

    Alright, considering that a deal has been reached between both parties, this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
  5. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Azalea Isles v. Luke201556 (2025) CR 02

    Considering that the Defendant submitted an answer to the complaint after the Prosecution made a motion to dismiss based on a settlement, the Court seeks to clarify the course of action being taken. Before issuing any ruling, can the Defendant please confirm whether or not they have agreed to a...
  6. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Azalea Isles v. fluffywaafelz (2025) CR 01

    Alright. This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
  7. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Azalea Isles v. fluffywaafelz (2025) CR 01

    The Prosecution is hereby asked to disclose to the Court the terms of such settlement plea deal for the public record.
  8. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Azalea Isles v. fluffywaafelz (2025) CR 01

    As specified, the deadline at hand was for the Defendant to respond to the case, not for the Prosecution. The Defendant, fluffywaafelz, is hereby given a final reminder to enter his plea to this case as soon as possible.
  9. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Azalea Isles v. Luke201556 (2025) CR 02

    In addition to the current extended timeframe, the court will provide another extension of 24 hours to extend understanding for the Defendant. This is in line with the standards set out by former Judge Milk Crack, urging officers of the court to prioritize real-life personal, mental, and medical...
  10. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Azalea Isles v. fluffywaafelz (2025) CR 01

    The Court accepts the motion to substitute counsel, as it reasonably prescribed to the Ministry of Justice. The Defendant is reminded to please respond to the court with an answer to the complaint, including the entering of a plea, within the specified timeframe. If an extension is required...
  11. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Azalea Isles v. Luke201556 (2025) CR 02

    The Court accepts the motion to substitute counsel, as it reasonably prescribed to the Ministry of Justice. The Defendant is reminded to please respond to the court with an answer to the complaint, including the entering of a plea, within the specified timeframe. If an extension is required...
  12. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Azalea Isles v. fluffywaafelz (2025) CR 01

    After careful consideration, the Court has decided to reject the Defendant's motion to dismiss at this time. The Defendant's motion to dismiss is based on several grounds. This includes lack of evidence, lack of probable cause, entrapment, and claims of political motivation. The Prosecution has...
  13. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Azalea Isles v. Luke201556 (2025) CR 02

    You are correct to reference the Case Structure, however you have not yet provided an answer to the criminal complaint. As noted in the steps: "the defendant will be notified of the complaint via the summons, they will have time to respond to the complaint with an answer." Therefore, the Court...
  14. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Azalea Isles v. fluffywaafelz (2025) CR 01

    The Prosecution has 24 hours to respond to the motion to dismiss before the Court makes a decision on it.
  15. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Azalea Isles v. Luke201556 (2025) CR 02

    Thank you for your remarks to the Court. After careful consideration, the Court has decided to reject the Defendant's motion to dismiss at this time. The Defendant has alleged prosecutorial bias, claiming the Prosecution’s actions are politically motivated. The Court finds these allegations...
  16. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Azalea Isles v. fluffywaafelz (2025) CR 01

    Considering that the Defendant has not yet provided an answer to the complaint, the Court respectfully accepts this amendment to the prayer for relief. This adjusts the prosecution's prayer for relief under "Future Employment Restrictions" as follows: As a reminder to the Defendant, they are...
  17. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Azalea Isles v. fluffywaafelz (2025) CR 01

    Given that the Ministry of Justice is unable to provide a public defender, the Defendant will be provided with an extensive 96 hours to post their answer to the criminal complaint. This should suffice enough time to find an attorney and or form of representation for the case.
  18. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Azalea Isles v. Luke201556 (2025) CR 02

    The Prosecution has 24 hours to respond to the motion to dismiss before the Court makes a decision on it.
  19. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Azalea Isles v. Luke201556 (2025) CR 02

    Writ of Summons Azalea Isles Criminal Court (CR) Case No. CR-25-02 Prosecutor: James Carrington (ven0msaint) Defendant: Luke Thegreat (Luke201556) The Defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of Azalea Isles v. Luke201556. Failure to respond within 48 hours may result in...
  20. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Azalea Isles v. fluffywaafelz (2025) CR 01

    There is currently no legal requirement for the court to provide a lawyer. However, it is my understanding that, pursuant to the Criminal Expungement Redo Act, the Ministry of Justice houses its own Office of Public Defenders within the guidelines of its official ministry policy. Is the...
Back
Top