Hello, Guest

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
What's new

Search results

  1. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Azalea Isles v. Galavance (2025) CR 03

    You have 24 hours from this post to provide your cross-examination questions. I would like to remind the government that there is a considerable expectation of timeliness as the party that has filed this criminal case.
  2. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Jebediah Crumplesnatch v. The "Prime Minister"

    After much consideration, the Court has decided to accept the motion to dismiss. I will outline the reasons below: The Plaintiff, Jebediah Crumplesnatch (Fergie_Foo), alleges that the Defendant, Prime Minister MilkCrack, has unlawfully given himself the authority as a Minister of Urban...
  3. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Nanicholls v. Azalea Isles (2025) CV 01

    At this time, the Court rejects the motion for default judgement. Given that the Prime Minister, through the Ministry of Justice, appoints government attorneys; the Court finds that there would be no reason to authorize representation by counsel, considering that the defence has now been...
  4. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Jebediah Crumplesnatch v. The "Prime Minister"

    Seeing as you have already filed your motion to dismiss, the Court will not consider this additional argument added out of turn. Please ensure you familiarize yourself with the Case Structure.
  5. Westray

    Case: Dismissed Jebediah Crumplesnatch v. The "Prime Minister"

    The Plaintiff, Jebediah Crumplesnatch (Fergie_Foo), has 24 hours to respond to the motion to dismiss before the Court makes a decision on it.
  6. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Nanicholls v. Azalea Isles (2025) CV 01

    The Plaintiff has 48 hours to provide a list of witnesses they wish to call, or to indicate to the court that they do not wish to call any witnesses.
  7. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Azalea Isles v. Galavance (2025) CR 03

    The Prosecution may now cross-examine by posing questions to the witnesses called by the Defence: Overlord Peonys (Overlordofpeonys) Nanicholls Gala Hamilton (Galavance) The Prosecution has 48 hours to do so, @Omegabiebel.
  8. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Azalea Isles v. Galavance (2025) CR 03

    After careful consideration, the Court renders the following decisions on the Defence's objections: Question 1 to Luke: Objection is overruled. The question is not leading because it seeks confirmation of a fact that the witness is in a unique position to answer Question 7 to Luke: Objection is...
  9. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Nanicholls v. Azalea Isles (2025) CV 01

    The Defendant has 48 hours to present an opening statement.
  10. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Azalea Isles v. Galavance (2025) CR 03

    The Prosecution @Omegabiebel and Defence @spyrolix are given a final reminder to please present your questions. You have 48 hours to do so.
  11. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Nanicholls v. Azalea Isles (2025) CV 01

    At this time, the Court has decided to deny the motion to dismiss, given that the Plaintiff has now alleged that such statements were false. Whether or not these statements were actually false, or if there was a clear intent (as required by the law) still needs to be considered in this case...
  12. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Azalea Isles v. Galavance (2025) CR 03

    The Defendant and Prosecution are both required to produce questions for their own witnesses first. Please post them as soon as possible, in a format like such: Witness A: 1. Did you x 2. Why did you x 3. Do you x Witness B: 1. Do you think x 2. What happened x ... and so forth, in order to...
  13. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Azalea Isles v. Galavance (2025) CR 03

    Writ of Summons - Witnesses Azalea Isles Criminal Court (CR) Case No. CR-25-03 Prosecutor: Omega Biebel (Omegabiebel) Defendant: Gala Hamilton (Galavance) The following individuals are required to appear before the court: Overlord Peonys (Overlordofpeonys) Nanicholls Gala Hamilton...
  14. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Nanicholls v. Azalea Isles (2025) CV 01

    After careful consideration, the Defendant's motion to dismiss is denied with conditions. Procedural fairness dictates that parties must have reasonable opportunities to present their case. To be clear, the Plaintiff must provide evidence or some form of argumentation to explain two key metrics...
  15. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Azalea Isles v. Galavance (2025) CR 03

    Both parties have 48 hours to provide a list of witnesses they wish to call, or to indicate to the Court that they would like to move forward without calling any witnesses.
  16. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Azalea Isles v. Galavance (2025) CR 03

    The Defendant now has 48 hours to provide an opening statement to the court. At this time, I wish to remind both parties about the Case Structure. Once the Defendant concludes their opening statement, witnesses will be called. Please begin to prepare a witness list in advance to ensure a timely...
  17. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Nanicholls v. Azalea Isles (2025) CV 01

    The Plaintiff, Nanicholls, has 24 hours to respond to the motion to dismiss before the Court makes a decision on it.
  18. Westray

    Parliament - ELECTION JANUARY 2025

    RESULTS Seven seats were up for election, resulting in each voter having a maximum of seven votes to cast. It should be noted that each voter did not cast all seven votes, some opted to only vote for a few candidates. Voters who did not meet the minimum requirements were removed from the count...
  19. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Nanicholls v. Azalea Isles (2025) CV 01

    Writ of Summons Azalea Isles Civil Court (CR) Case No. CV-25-01 Plaintiff: Nanicholls Nanicholls (nanicholls) Defendant: Government of Azalea Isles The Defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of Nanicholls v. Azalea Isles. Failure to respond within 48 hours may result in...
  20. Westray

    Case: Adjourned Nanicholls v. Azalea Isles (2025) CV 01

    Considering this is a civil case, would the Plaintiff be able to please clarify what damages they are seeking? (the money/relief being sought from the Defendant). Is it the $50 to be payable to the Plaintiff?
Back
Top