Search results

The Defence may respond to the Plaintiff's objection by explaining to the Court why they believe such question is relevant. If there is no response within the next 12 hours, the Court will rule on the objection regardless of a response.

In accordance with the currently established Motions and Objections, an expedited hearing shall "allow for opening arguments followed immediately by a verdict afterwards," given that both parties have indicated an interest in such expedited hearing, we will move forward with that. The Plaintiff...

The Defence is asked to provide their closing statement to the Court. Please do so within the next 48 hours.

@Omegabiebel does the Defence have any more follow-up questions?

The Court has taken into consideration the Plaintiff's motion for sanctions, and would like to indicate that any further tardiness or lack of respect for the deadlines in this case may result in contempt penalties. As for the motions put forward by the Defence, the Court has decided to reject...

The Defendant is asked to provide an answer to the complaint as posted above accordingly.

Thank you. The Plaintiff is asked to provide their closing statement to the Court. They may include a response to such evidence in their statement.

As for the missed answer to complaint, this was an oversight and error on my end due to both parties barraging the Court with various requests, and the Defence changing counsel mid-case. I apologize, however would point out that the Defence had the opportunity to answer the details of the...

Given that the Defence has not provided questions to the witnesses beyond the deadline, the Court will move forward with the next step in the case structure. The Plaintiff, Nanicholls, is asked to provide their closing statement to the Court within the next 48 hours.

In order to clear up any uncertainty, the Plaintiff is asked to provide their finalized amended complaint to the Court within the next 48 hours. I remind them to not waste the Court's time naming numerous "co-defendants" unless they believe there is a lawful basis to do so. If they believe there...

As Spyrolix was not on the initial witness list, he will not be included in the questioning. That being said, since Spyrolix is the defence attorney for the Defendant, it is advisable that he may consider answering such questions in his closing remarks. With regards to the evidence presented...

If the Prosecution wishes to ask any follow-up questions, they have 12 hours to do so. Afterwards, the Defence will have the opportunity to cross-examine the other side's witnesses.

Alright, we may proceed. The Defendant has 72 hours to provide a response to the complaint. This additional time is given in consideration to the changes in this case.

Before moving forward, does the Plaintiff intend to prove that Milk Crack acted outside of his constitutional duties? As noted before, claims seeking government action, such as reinstatement to a government position, must be directed at the government itself, not an individual. Conversely, if...

After careful consideration, the Court has decided to reject the motion to dismiss. The Defence argues that the Plaintiff lacks standing and that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to intervene in parliamentary matters. The Plaintiff, in response, asserts that standing has been...

Since well beyond 48 hours has now elapsed, the Court will move forward. The Defence has 24 hours to provide questions to their witnesses.

In accordance with Motions and Objections, a motion for an expedited hearing is "made by the plaintiff (or prosecution) with the complaint and agreed upon by the defendant in an answer" - therefore, the Court asks that the Defendant provide a response as to whether they would agree to an...

Writ of Summons Azalea Isles Civil Court (CR) Case No. CV-25-02 Plaintiff: Jebediah Crumplesnatch (Fergie_Foo) Defendant: Government of Azalea Isles The Defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of Crumplesnatch v. Azalea Isles. Failure to respond within 48 hours may...

After careful consideration, the Court renders the following decisions on the Defence's objections: Question 2 to Hamilton (Galavance): Objection is sustained. The question presupposes that the Defendant has lied, which improperly assumes guilt and compels an admission rather than allowing the...

Having reviewed the plaintiff’s complaint, the defendant’s motion to dismiss, and all relevant constitutional provisions, this Court notes the following: The Constitution of the Azalea Isles defines civil trials as disputes "between two parties." The Plaintiff has named multiple defendants...