- Joined
- Feb 16, 2025
- Messages
- 34
- Thread Author
- #1
Fauz Wolfe/Ministry of Justice
v.
Skibidi Fart, Defendant
Criminal Complaint:
The Ministry of Justice brings forth this criminal case on behalf of the Complainants affected. On May 25th, the Defendant had unlawfully entered the first Complainant’s property and stole their horse. The Defendant proceeded to then hide the horse, and subsequently extorted an unreasonable amount of money from both of the Complainants in exchange for the horse’s whereabouts.
Parties:
Factual Allegations:
Legal Claims:
Prayer for Relief:
Evidence:
Exhibit A: A picture of the Complainant’s horse on the first Complaint’s private property.

Exhibit B: The Defendant stating they know where the horse is, and asking for money from both Complainants.

Exhibit C: The Defendant stating that they hid the horse, and continuing to ask for money.

Exhibit D: The negotiation of the price from $1000 to $950.

Exhibit E: The actual payout to the Defendant, resulting in both Complainants falling into debt.

Verification:
I, Fauz Wolfe, hereby affirm that the allegations in the complaint AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.
v.
Skibidi Fart, Defendant
Criminal Complaint:
The Ministry of Justice brings forth this criminal case on behalf of the Complainants affected. On May 25th, the Defendant had unlawfully entered the first Complainant’s property and stole their horse. The Defendant proceeded to then hide the horse, and subsequently extorted an unreasonable amount of money from both of the Complainants in exchange for the horse’s whereabouts.
Parties:
- Prosecution, Fauz Wolfe/Ministry of Justice
- First Complainant, White Shadow (RoseChan)
- Second Complainant, Benjamin Higgins (Br0k3nC4lculat0r)
- Defendant, Skibidi Fart
Factual Allegations:
- The first Complainant brought their horse back to their private property for safekeeping.
- Shortly after, when the first Complainant returned to their private property, they discovered that the horse was missing.
- Upon inquiring about the missing horse, the Defendant publicly stated that he hid the animal.
- In exchange for the horse’s location, the Defendant publicly asked each Complainant to pay them a sum of money.
- In the end, the Complainants each paid $950 in exchange for the horse’s whereabouts.
Legal Claims:
- The Defendant committed a robbery, violating Section 2d of the Criminal Code Foundation Act, where robbery is defined as “the unlawful taking of property from another person”
- The Defendant trespassed the first Complainant’s property, violating Section 3a of the Criminal Code Foundation Act, where trespassing is defined as “the unauthorized entry onto the property of another person”
Prayer for Relief:
- A jail-time totaling 10 minutes, 5 minutes for the robbery and 5 minutes for trespassing, as outlined in the Criminal Code Foundation Act.
- A government fine totaling $100, $50 for the robbery and $50 for trespassing as outlined in the Criminal Code Foundation Act.
- A separate fine totaling $1900, so that $950 can be repaid to both Complainants.
Evidence:
Exhibit A: A picture of the Complainant’s horse on the first Complaint’s private property.

Exhibit B: The Defendant stating they know where the horse is, and asking for money from both Complainants.

Exhibit C: The Defendant stating that they hid the horse, and continuing to ask for money.

Exhibit D: The negotiation of the price from $1000 to $950.

Exhibit E: The actual payout to the Defendant, resulting in both Complainants falling into debt.

Verification:
I, Fauz Wolfe, hereby affirm that the allegations in the complaint AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.