Case: Pending Aero Nox v. Azalea Isles (2025) CV 15

[Robidemon2]

Aero Nox, Plaintiff
v.
Government of Azalea, Defendant

---

Civil Complaint​

Plaintiff Aero Nox brings this complaint against the Government of Azalea for violating constitutionally protected voting rights by enforcing the Voter Registration Act in a manner that disenfranchises eligible citizens. The Government has denied voting rights to citizens who meet all constitutional requirements by refusing to accept as valid for this general initial voter registrations during the electoral period, incorrectly labeling such registrations as impermissible "changes" of residence. This misinterpretation contradicts both statutory language and constitutional authority.

---

Parties​

Plaintiff​

• Aero Nox

Defendant​

• Government of Azalea

​

---

Factual Allegations​

1. The Constitution of Azalea establishes the qualifications for voting, requiring that a citizen:
   • (a) Have at least twelve (12) cumulative hours of playtime;
   • (b) Have at least five (5) hours of monthly playtime; and
   • (c) Live in the district in which they are voting.
2. Plaintiff Aero Nox meets all constitutional qualifications for voting.
3. Numerous citizens similarly meet these constitutional requirements.
4. Despite this, the Government of Azalea has denied Aero Nox and others the right to vote in the upcoming general election.
5. The Government bases its justification on the Voter Registration Act, which requires citizens to submit a voter registration form including their legal name, primary residence, documents, and party affiliation.
6. The Government claims that citizens cannot "change" their residence during an electoral period.
7. Aero Nox, along with affected citizens, did not have a pre-existing voter registration on file prior to the electoral period.
8. Submitting a residence for the first time is not a "change" it is an initial registration, which the Voter Registration Act requires.
9. A "change" necessarily requires a pre-existing entry. The citizens in question never had one; therefore, no "change" occurred. The lack of an entry is not an entry in of itself.
10. The Government’s interpretation creates an additional voting qualification not present in the Constitution or in the Voter Registration Act itself, : having a pre-registered residence before the electoral period begins.
11. This additional requirement unlawfully restricts voting rights and contradicts the constitutional guarantee.
12. By refusing to accept initial registrations, the Government is denying constitutionally eligible citizens their right to vote.

---

Legal Claims​

1. Violation of Constitutional Voting Rights
   • The Government's refusal to accept initial voter registrations during the electoral period violates the Constitution by imposing restrictions absent from constitutional text.
2. Unlawful Interpretation of the Voter Registration Act
   • The Government incorrectly interprets initial registrations as "changes," contrary to statutory intent and basic definitional logic.
3. Unconstitutional Disenfranchisement
   • The Government is denying the right to vote to citizens who meet all constitutional qualifications based solely on a misapplication of statutory language.

---

Prayer for Relief​

The plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant the following relief:

1. A declaration that initial voter registrations are not "changes" and may not be prohibited during the electoral period.
2. An order requiring the Government to immediately recognize and process all voter registrations from constitutionally eligible citizens.
3. Any other relief the Court deems appropriate and just.

---

Verification​

I,Robidemon2, hereby affirm that the allegations in the complaint AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.

 

[Robidemon2]

Motion for Injunction


Plaintiff hereby moves the Court of the Azalea Isles for an injunction to prevent ongoing constitutional violations resulting from the Government of Azalea’s enforcement of the Voter Registration Act.



The Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court issue one of the following forms of relief:

A temporary injunction striking or suspending the section of the Voter Registration Act that prohibits voter residence updates during the electoral period, but only as applied to initial voter registrations for citizens who did not previously have a registered residence.
Immediate suspension of this section is required to prevent further harm, as the Plaintiff’s rights are being violated continuously.



Alternatively, an injunction halting or pausing the current election until voter registrations for constitutionally eligible citizens including Aero Nox are properly accepted and processed.



Continuing the election while Aero Nox remains excluded causes ongoing and compounding harm, as each passing day of the electoral period further entrenches his inability to meaningfully participate.
Aero Nox is prevented from voting, participating in campaign activity as a recognized voter, influencing candidate selection, or being counted as part of his district’s electorate.
Every procedural step of the election conducted without his lawful inclusion ,such as candidate qualification, campaigning, polling preparation, and vote tallying, causes irreversible damage that cannot be undone once the election concludes.
Therefore, halting the election is necessary to prevent further violation of Aero Nox’s constitutional rights and to preserve the fairness and legitimacy of the electoral process.

 

[fauzfauzfauz]

WRIT OF SUMMONS

Azalea Isles District Court

Case No. CV-25-14​

Plaintiff: Aero Nox
Defendant: Azalea Isles

The Defendant is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Aero Nox v. Azalea Isles. Failure to do so within 48 hours may result in a default judgement. The Court asks both parties to familiarize themselves with the relevant court documents, appropriate formats, and the law, especially as referenced in the complaint. Please ensure all court orders are followed.

Additionally, the temporary injunction is denied for now, and will not be considered until the Plaintiff provides evidence of their allegations. Despite the fact the filing was already submitted, I will show grace and allow you 24 hours to submit evidence relevant to your claim.


Signed,
District Court Justice Fauz Wolfe

 

[RealHanuta]

Motion to Dismiss

Your Honor,
the Constitution is quite clear here. As amended by the Electoral Reform Amendment, the Voter Registration section of the Constitution reads: “Individuals may be required by the Azalea Isles Government to complete a voter registration process in order to qualify to run for office, and to vote.”The Voter Registration Act fulfills this provision of the Constitution by establishing a clear voter registration process.
A new primary residence is a change in status, regardless of whether one was on file before, and the Constitution gives Parliament and the Azalea Isles Government the power to establish and manage this process. It may be reformed legislatively, but the Constitution, as amended, is clear that the Government is in charge of managing the process. As such, we motion for dismissal of the case.

 

[Robidemon2]

Your Honor, the Plaintiff asks to respond to the defendants motion to dismiss.

 

[Robidemon2]

WRIT OF SUMMONS

Azalea Isles District Court

Case No. CV-25-14​

Plaintiff: Aero Nox
Defendant: Azalea Isles

The Defendant is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Aero Nox v. Azalea Isles. Failure to do so within 48 hours may result in a default judgement. The Court asks both parties to familiarize themselves with the relevant court documents, appropriate formats, and the law, especially as referenced in the complaint. Please ensure all court orders are followed.

Additionally, the temporary injunction is denied for now, and will not be considered until the Plaintiff provides evidence of their allegations. Despite the fact the filing was already submitted, I will show grace and allow you 24 hours to submit evidence relevant to your claim.


Signed,
District Court Justice Fauz Wolfe

Your Honor,
Plaintiff Aeronox4 was outside the voting registration period thus does not qualify as a voter, the reason does not qualify as a voter is because of a wrong interpretation, in my eyes, of the Voter Registration Act that states that "primary residences cannot be changed once the electoral period begins". this interpretation would overstep the delegatory powers given by the constitution . While I am unable to prove damages that will occur Post hoc I am able without a shadow of a doubt state that his voter registration has not been accepted for this general election. In terms of damages we are looking at the violation of his rights not only in the constitution but I would even argue in the Voter Registration Act itself.

 

[fauzfauzfauz]

Thank you for the addition. The Court is going to authorize the temporary injunction as followed: The upcoming by election shall be paused pending the verdict of this case.

The halt is only to last until a verdict has been reached in the interest of justice, before the alleged damages become irreversible, and such that both sides can sufficiently argue their case. The Court will not authorize any additional relief aligning with what the Plaintiff prays for in the interest of the Defendant, nor will support the Defendant’s claims, pending a verdict. Given the low stake nature of the by-election, the Court deems this to be the best path to take in order to circumnavigate any additional complications.

The Motion to Dismiss is also denied, and I will also like to note the Plaintiff does not have to ask for permission to respond to a motion in my court. If either party would like to contest the contents of the motion before one is ruled on, they are welcome to do so. (And of course, is welcome to file a motion to reconsider should a party be unhappy with a ruling)

 

[Anthony_org]

Your honor, may I file an amicus brief about this case?

 

[fauzfauzfauz]

Can you state your interest in the matter, or to either the Plaintiff or the Defendant? Will you be able to affirm that any and all statements made in this court are true and correct to the best of your knowledge, information, and belief, and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury?